Inequalities in access to teachers in selective schooling areas

By

We recently published a report with the Social Market Foundation showing that schools serving more disadvantaged communities appeared to have greater difficulties in recruiting suitably qualified teachers. Ofsted contacted us to ask whether these inequalities were more or less pronounced in areas with selective secondary schooling because this has been an area of inquiry for them.

Dividing pupils at the age of 11 into grammar and non-selective schools presents a particularly complex example of the social sorting we explore in the original report. It is well-known that few children eligible for free school meals pass the eleven plus. One consequence is that the teachers they are likely to encounter will be different to their more advantaged peers who proceed to grammar schools.

To illustrate this we divide our analysis into three areas:

  • Fully selective areas where at least 1-in-5 proceed to grammar school: Trafford, Buckinghamshire, Slough, Kent, Medway, Southend-on-Sea, Torbay, Wirral, Poole, Bexley, Sutton, Lincolnshire, Reading
  • Partially selective or mixed areas where 7-20% proceed to a grammar school: Bournemouth, Kingston-upon-Thames, Plymouth, Gloucestershire, Calderdale, Barnet, Birmingham, Warwickshire, Telford and Wrekin, Bromley
  • Comprehensive areas that may have isolated grammar schools: all other local authorities

The chart below shows that grammar schools do indeed have a more stable staffing structure than other schools in the area. The most striking difference is that only half the number of teachers move from a grammar school to another school each year. Numbers leaving the profession from grammar schools are actually quite high, which reflects their much older age profile and thus retirements.

grammarteachers1

These differences in the qualification profile of grammar schools and other schools in the same areas is stark: grammar schools have much larger numbers of very experienced teachers and very few unqualified teachers.
grammarteachers2

Finally, pupils in grammar schools seem much more likely to be taught by someone who has an academic degree in the subject. These differences do vary across subject. At KS3 the differences are most pronounced for maths and science, which is consistent with the view that these are the subjects where recruitment is currently most difficult.

grammarteachers3

And the analysis of KS4 suggests that the shortages within the sciences in the non-selective schools in grammar areas are most pronounced in physics (and to a lesser extent chemistry).

grammarteachers4

This analysis reminds us that, whilst we worry about the impact of 11+ selection on the social segregation of children across schools in an area, we should also think about how it affects the choices that teachers are making about where to teach. There are policy solutions that could preserve the academic separation of the children, whilst ensuring greater equity in access to high quality teaching.

By | 2017-10-23T13:17:31+00:00 June 22nd, 2016|Admissions, Teacher careers|

About the Author:

Rebecca Allen is Director of Education Datalab and an expert in the analysis of large scale administrative and survey datasets, including the National Pupil Database and School Workforce Census. Her research explores the impact of government reforms on school behaviour, with a particular focus on accountability and teacher labour markets. She is currently on leave from her academic post as Reader in Economics of Education at UCL Institute of Education.

One Comment

  1. […] wouldn’t need to exist. Teacher training would be heavily oversubscribed and there wouldn’t be inequalities in access to high quality teachers across schools. But, for now, it serves to mitigate some of the toughest recruitment problems for […]

Leave A Comment